Cui, Zhiyao and Wang, Qianyi and Yan, Haoyang and Zhang, Yiqun and Ren, Siyue and Zhang, Hangfan and Tan, Zelin and Li, Hao and Mu, Chunjiang and Cai, Dexian and Zhang, Shao and Zhang, Chen and Li, Meng and Chai, Jianan and Yuting, Fan and Ye, Zichao and Yang, Xiaolei and LU, XINYAO and Yu, Yuyang and Lou, Wenjie and Wang, Xiaosong and Ling, Fenghua and Feng, Shiyang and Su, Mao and Zhang, Qiaosheng and Zhang, Bo and BAI, LEI and Chen, Yang and Hu, Shuyue
The 8th International Conference on Distributed Artificial Intelligence
, 2026
@inproceedings{cui2026agentpanel,
title = {AgentPanel: Toward a New Paradigm for Human{\textendash}{AI} Collaboration in Exploring Scientific Questions},
author = {Cui, Zhiyao and Wang, Qianyi and Yan, Haoyang and Zhang, Yiqun and Ren, Siyue and Zhang, Hangfan and Tan, Zelin and Li, Hao and Mu, Chunjiang and Cai, Dexian and Zhang, Shao and Zhang, Chen and Li, Meng and Chai, Jianan and Yuting, Fan and Ye, Zichao and Yang, Xiaolei and LU, XINYAO and Yu, Yuyang and Lou, Wenjie and Wang, Xiaosong and Ling, Fenghua and Feng, Shiyang and Su, Mao and Zhang, Qiaosheng and Zhang, Bo and BAI, LEI and Chen, Yang and Hu, Shuyue},
booktitle = {The 8th International Conference on Distributed Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2026},
url = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=6l8mQ9iw2B},
eprint = {2608.03283},
archiveprefix = {arXiv},
primaryclass = {cs.AI},
arxiv = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03283},
image = {agentpanel.png},
link = {https://agentpanel.cc/},
github = {https://github.com/InternScience/AgentPanel},
keywords = {main}
}
Identifying promising scientific ideas remains an important challenge in research practice. Researchers commonly rely on small-group discussions or one-to-one interactions with a single large language model, yet these approaches often expose them to only a limited range of perspectives and directions. We present AgentPanel, a multi-agent forum for human–AI collaboration in scientific exploration. Heterogeneous agents asynchronously discuss scientific questions in a forum-style environment, while researchers can submit questions, browse and organize candidate ideas, engage agents in follow-up interactions, and optionally generate post-hoc summary reports. We evaluate AgentPanel in terms of idea quality, exploration breadth, interaction effectiveness, candidate-selection efficiency, and practical utility. Offline experiments show that AgentPanel outperforms a centralized multi-agent debate baseline. A human study with 20 participants further shows that users value AgentPanel for perspective diversity and exploration support. In experience-based comparisons with commonly used LLM tools, 65% of participants favored AgentPanel for both breadth of research directions and overall suitability for early-stage exploration. The platform is publicly available at https://agentpanel.cc/.